Descriptive information of peers’ behavior is often used to nudge individuals to behave according to a norm. We test whether effects found may be driven by anchoring or peer effects, and test boundary conditions in two mTurk-based experimental studies with a retirement saving contribution rate scenario. In study 1, we find a strong similarity between the anchoring and peer effect. In follow-up study 2, no anchoring effect is found when more extreme values (peer norms or anchors more distant from the control group behavior) are used, whereas the peer effect remains present. Furthermore, we find evidence that the informational component – as opposed to the normative component – of peer information plays a stronger role for peer effects. Lastly, we find that, when exposed to peer information, women consistently contribute more than the provided retirement contribution norm, whereas men do not.

JEL Classification D14, D91

Keywords: Social Norms, Peer Effects, Heuristics, Anchoring, Financial Decision-making, Consumer Behavior, Financial Services

Netspar, Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement, is een denktank en kennisnetwerk. Netspar is gericht op een goed geïnformeerd pensioendebat.

MEER OVER NETSPAR


Missie en strategie           •           Netwerk           •           Organisatie           •          Podcasts
Board Brief            •            Werkprogramma 2023-2027           •           Onderzoeksagenda

OVER NETSPAR

Onze partners

B20231704_PGIM_Blacklogo2
B20221103_Zwitserlevengrayscale
B20231704_PensioenFederatie_Blacklogo
B20231704_DNB_Blacklogo
B20160708_tilburg university
Bekijk al onze partners