Descriptive information of peers’ behavior is often used to nudge individuals to behave according to a norm. We test whether effects found may be driven by anchoring or peer effects, and test boundary conditions in two mTurk-based experimental studies with a retirement saving contribution rate scenario. In study 1, we find a strong similarity between the anchoring and peer effect. In follow-up study 2, no anchoring effect is found when more extreme values (peer norms or anchors more distant from the control group behavior) are used, whereas the peer effect remains present. Furthermore, we find evidence that the informational component – as opposed to the normative component – of peer information plays a stronger role for peer effects. Lastly, we find that, when exposed to peer information, women consistently contribute more than the provided retirement contribution norm, whereas men do not.

JEL Classification D14, D91

Keywords: Social Norms, Peer Effects, Heuristics, Anchoring, Financial Decision-making, Consumer Behavior, Financial Services

Netspar, Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement, is een denktank en kennisnetwerk. Netspar is gericht op een goed geïnformeerd pensioendebat.

MEER OVER NETSPAR


Missie en strategie           •           Netwerk           •           Organisatie           •          Magazine
Netspar Brief            •            Werkprogramma 2019-2023           •           Onderzoekagenda

OVER NETSPAR

Onze partners

B20160708_dnb
svb
B20211216_shell download
B20160708_uva
B20200924_Ortec Finance logo 250px_banner_small
Bekijk al onze partners