Time-inconsistent preferences, borrowing costs, and social security

Can time-inconsistent preferences justify a mandatory saving program like social security? Previous studies have considered this research question speci?fically for the extreme assumptions of missing credit markets and perfect credit markets, but not for the intermediate case in which borrowing is costly. We consider a more general setting
with a credit spread between the interest rates on borrowing and saving. Our setting nests the extremes of missing credit markets (in?nite spread) and perfect credit markets (zero spread), and it also includes the full spectrum of credit spreads in between. We
prove that a fully-funded social security arrangement is irrelevant only at the knife edge of perfect credit markets. In other words, if there are borrowing costs of any size then social security can improve the welfare of individuals with time-inconsistent preferences. We conclude that non-standard preferences provide a more compelling justifi?cation for the mandatory saving role of social security than previously supposed.

Netspar, Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement, is een denktank en kennisnetwerk. Netspar is gericht op een goed geïnformeerd pensioendebat.

MEER OVER NETSPAR


Missie en strategie           •           Netwerk           •           Organisatie           •          Podcasts
Board Brief            •            Werkprogramma 2023-2027           •           Onderzoeksagenda

OVER NETSPAR

Onze partners

B20220412_SPIN_logo+naam_2xPMS_2_voettekst
B20160708_universiteit leiden
B20160708_asr
BPL_Pensioen_logo+pay-off - 1610-1225 v1.1_grijswaarden
B20221103_Zwitserlevengrayscale
Bekijk al onze partners