Does home ownership crowd out investment in children’s human capital?

Parents generally care for their kids, either for altruistic or for strategic reasons. To secure them a better life than their own, they can invest in the children’s human capital or accumulate real wealth to bequeath to them. In equilibrium, with complete markets and no imperfection, the marginal returns from the two strategies are equalized, an optimal distribution of children’s endowment between human and financial (real) wealth is reached and no crowding out occurs. In the real world, with incomplete and imperfect markets, adisplacement can occur. A strong preference for home-ownership makes parents inclined to consider the house as the typical bequest-friendly asset, even at the expense of children’s education. Mis-perceptions of the relative returns of the two different forms of wealth, with a perceived excessive premium of the returns from housing wealth, may also be at work. We consider this picture tobe highly representative of the Italian situation and analyse the possible trade off between (children’s) human and real capital by using the Bank of Italy’s Survey of Household Income and Wealth (SHIW). Our evidence points in the direction of confirming our hypothesis.

Netspar, Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement, is een denktank en kennisnetwerk. Netspar is gericht op een goed geïnformeerd pensioendebat.

MEER OVER NETSPAR


Missie en strategie           •           Netwerk           •           Organisatie           •          Podcasts
Board Brief            •            Werkprogramma 2023-2027           •           Onderzoeksagenda

OVER NETSPAR

Onze partners

B20160708_university of groningen
B20160615_pggmgroengrijs_grijswaarden_small
B20220518_BNP Paribas logo_voettekst
B20211201_Cardano_Logo 2021_website
AFM logo 2023 zwart wit
Bekijk al onze partners