Investing for Retirement with an Explicit Benchmark

“Non-constant risk aversion in investment reduces uncertainty about pension capital”

A disadvantage of defined contribution schemes, like those in the new Dutch pension deal, is the considerable uncertainty about pension capital at retirement. This is caused by the investment strategies used, which maximise the return with a constant relative risk aversion. This study explored the impact of using a non-constant relative risk aversion, which allows investment strategies that explicitly try to achieve the benchmark pension capital at retirement. We found that this approach gives a high chance of obtaining the desired benchmark, thereby reducing participants’ uncertainty about their pension income.

Download one pager


Key Takeaways for the Industry

  • Direct contribution pension schemes that use a stochastic benchmark with a non-constant risk aversion provide significantly lower uncertainty about pension capital at retirement compared to traditional life cycle investment strategies.

Want to know more?

Read the paper ‘Investing for Retirement with an Explicit Benchmark’ by Anne Balter¹, Lennard Beijering², Pascal Janssen³, Frank de Jong¹, Agnes Joseph⁴, Thijs Kamma⁵, and Antoon Pelsser⁵ ⁶ – ¹ TiU, ² Zanders, ³ PGGM, ⁴ Achmea, ⁵ UM, ⁶ UVA.

Netspar, Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement, is a thinktank and knowledge network. Netspar is dedicated to promoting a wider understanding of the economic and social implications of pensions, aging and retirement in the Netherlands and Europe.


Mission en strategy           •           Network           •           Organisation           •          Magazine
Board Brief            •            Actionplan 2023-2027           •           Researchagenda


Our partners

B20160708_universiteit leiden
BPL_Pensioen_logo+pay-off - 1610-1225 v1.1_grijswaarden
View all partners