Did socially responsible stocks perform better during the COVID-19 crisis?

Recent financial media articles and research suggest that the stocks of firms with a stronger environmental, social and governance (ESG) rating might perform better during crises. An extensive analysis of 6,000 stocks in 45 countries during the COVID-19 crisis and a longer-term analysis over 2003-2020 cast doubts on this view. There is little evidence that strong ESG stocks perform better or worse than other stocks, neither during crises nor in crisis-free periods. North America is the exception. There, socially responsible stocks appear to be more resilient during crises.

Read one pager


Key Takeaways for the Industry

  • Strong ESG stocks may not have served as “rainy day assets” during crises. That said, they also did not underperform during crisis or over longer periods.
  • ESG ratings are less reliable than financial creditworthiness ratings. New research is needed to understand differences between ratings and their relation with stock returns.


Want to know more?

Read the paper “On the Resilience of ESG Stocks during COVID-19: Global Evidence” by Gianfranco Gianfrate¹, Tim Kievid² and Mathijs van Dijk² – ¹EDHEC Business School, ²EUR.

Netspar, Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement, is a thinktank and knowledge network. Netspar is dedicated to promoting a wider understanding of the economic and social implications of pensions, aging and retirement in the Netherlands and Europe.


Mission en strategy           •           Network           •           Organisation           •          Magazine
Board Brief            •            Actionplan 2023-2027           •           Researchagenda


Our partners

B20160708_universiteit utrecht
B20210909_SPMS_logo download greyscale smaller
View all partners