Skip to content

Webinar by Moshe Milevsky (York University) Adam Smith’s Reversionary Annuity: Money’s Worth, Default Options, and Auto Enrolments

Abstract: When Adam Smith – author of Wealth of Nations (1776) and Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) – joined the University of Glasgow as a 28-year-old professor in 1751, he participated in a “benefit scheme” that was unique for its time, although quite common in the 21st century. The scheme offered participants a choice of levels at which to contribute savings to a fund, ranging from 2% to 10% of wages, with benefits granted in the form of a reversionary annuity to a spouse and/or lump sum to children. This lecture (i.) describes the scheme in financial and actuarial terms, (ii.) values Smith’s annuity and (iii.) examines the choices made by participants; a scheme which was prudently managed by Presbyterian ministers in the Church of Scotland. The (novel) research contribution is to leverage archival data to measure the extent of insurance anti-selection and to show that debates around choice architecture, default options and auto enrollment which infuse the pension & retirement literature in the 21st century, were prevalent in the mid 18th. For the record, Adam Smith actively contributed at the highest allowed rate, but it wasn’t a “good” investment for him ex ante or ex post. As for why, one must attend the presentation…

You can register via this link: Webinar by Moshe Milevsky (York University) Tickets, Wed 19/07/2023 at 10:00 pm | Eventbrite

About the speaker:

Moshe Arye Milevsky is a tenured professor at Schulich and a member of the Graduate Faculty of Mathematics & Statistics at York University. His research interests are at the intersection of pensions & retirement, actuarial mathematics and the history of financial products. In addition to academic research work, Professor Milevsky is a fin-tech entrepreneur with a number of U.S. patents and computational innovations in the field of retirement income financing.

This webinar is presented by the International Pension Research Association (IPRA).

About IPRA

IPRA is an international organisation established with the aim of improving the quality and impact of research on pensions and related ageing issues to optimise social and economic outcomes for an ageing world. Its inaugural executive committee comprises representatives of the ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR), International Organisation of Pension Supervisors (IOPS), OECDNetspar at Tilburg University, Pension Research Council at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and WTW.

Register

Location

Online via eventbrite

Register

Similar Events

Doorwerken na pensioen: praktijk en potentieel – Jasper Bosma – After-lunch webinar

: In het licht van aanhoudende krapte op de arbeidsmarkt wordt in toenemende mate gekeken naar AOW-gerechtigden die graag actief willen blijven in betaald werk. In dit onderzoek is daarom gekeken naar de trends rondom werken boven de AOW-leeftijd. Wie werken er door, waarom, wat voor werk doen ze, hoeveel, en in welke vorm? Daarnaast kijken we ook naar de overwegingen van AOW-gerechtigden die niet werken. Wat houdt hen tegen, en onder welke voorwaarden zouden zij bereid zijn wel te werken? Tot slot gaan we kort in op de rol van de werkgever en de overgang naar het nieuwe pensioenstelsel. Bij de beantwoording van de vragen kijken we naar verschillen naar geslacht, opleidingsniveau, en de sector waarin AOW-gerechtigden werkzaam zijn (geweest).

Matchmaking 2026

On Tuesday, February 10, 2026, the annual Matchmaking Event for the Theme Call 2026 will be held. Participation from partners is an important success factor. The Netspar Board of Directors will provide a brief overview of the available funding opportunities and procedures. Afterwards, several researchers will present their research ideas, and partners will have the opportunity to share their interests. Following the sessions, there will be time for networking to encourage collaboration between science and practice.

Kansenweging en de implicaties voor levenscyclus beleggen – Martijn de Vries – After lunch webinar

Veel huishoudens beginnen laat met pensioensparen, beleggen relatief weinig van hun vermogen in risicodragende activa en kiezen bij pensionering slechts beperkt voor annuïtering. Deze patronen wijken sterk af van de voorspellingen van klassieke rationele levenscyclusmodellen en vormen daarmee drie hardnekkige pensioenpuzzels.In dit onderzoek worden deze keuzes opnieuw geanalyseerd, uitgaande van een ander gedragsmodel: probability weighting (kansenwegen), een kernonderdeel van de cumulatieve prospecttheorie. Binnen de financieel-economische literatuur blijkt dit gedragsmodel bijzonder succesvol in het verklaren van feitelijk menselijk gedrag. In dit onderzoek analyseer ik of probability weighting kan fungeren als unificerend mechanisme achter de drie hierboven beschreven empirische afwijkingen.

Sign up for event

Oops! We could not locate your form.